Generated reference › Observer Form 3D — Control Systems/Gain Scheduling
kind: generated#block#control-systems-gain-scheduling

Observer Form 3D — Control Systems/Gain Scheduling

ABCFH 3D

Control_Systems/Gain_Scheduling/Observer_Form_3D · 5 input / 1 output port(s) at insert · exports to Python, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog, PLC Structured Text

Description#

The block's own DESCRIPTION_HTML, rendered verbatim — the same text the config dialog's info panel and the library navigator show. Fix a wrong sentence in the block's .cpp (R-D9), never here.

3D Observer Form

Control Systems / Gain Scheduling

The Aerospace Blockset's 3D Observer Form [A(v),B(v),C(v),F(v),H(v)]: a controller built as an observer of the plant with state feedback on the estimate, all five matrices scheduled on three variables, v1, v2 and v3.

dx/dt = A(v)·x + (H(v)·(e + C(v)·x) + B(v)·umeas),   udem = F(v)·x

The observer is driven by the actuator command that was really applied, umeas, so when the actuator saturates, or the controller is switched out of the loop, the estimate keeps tracking the plant instead of winding up. Each matrix is the trilinear blend of the eight stored around (v1, v2, v3), exactly as in the 3D Controller, and each variable clamps outside its breakpoints.

Ports

  • e – the output error y − ydem (the Simulink block's y-y_dem), a [q,1] column, q being the row count of one C matrix.
  • v1 – the first scheduling variable, a scalar (the Simulink block labels it AoA).
  • v2 – the second scheduling variable, a scalar (labelled AoS there).
  • v3 – the third scheduling variable, a scalar (labelled Mach there).
  • u_meas – the measured actuator command, an [r,1] column, r being the column count of one B matrix.
  • u_dem – the demanded actuator command, a [p,1] column, p being the row count of one F matrix.

Parameters

  • A Matrices – the n×n A matrix for every breakpoint triple, stacked vertically with the first variable varying fastest and the third slowest: a [P1·P2·P3·n, n] matrix. From a MATLAB array A(:,:,i,j,l) the config is reshape(permute(A,[1 3 4 5 2]),[],size(A,2)).
  • B Matrices – the n×r B matrices (umeas to the state), stacked the same way.
  • C Matrices – the q×n C matrices (the state to the predicted output), stacked the same way.
  • F Matrices – the p×n state-feedback gains, stacked the same way.
  • H Matrices – the n×q observer gains, stacked the same way. They are used as given: nothing is placed.
  • Breakpoints v1 – the P1 values of v1, strictly increasing, at least two.
  • Breakpoints v2 – the P2 values of v2, strictly increasing, at least two.
  • Breakpoints v3 – the P3 values of v3, strictly increasing, at least two.
  • Initial State – x at the start of the run: a scalar for every state, or an [n,1] column. Default 0.
  • Sampling Time (s) – zero or less inherits the solver's rate; a positive value runs the block at that period.

The defaults are a first-order example on a 2×2×2 grid; the Simulink block has no literal defaults (its dialog names workspace variables).

Code export

All ten targets: Python, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog and PLC Structured Text. Each variable's interval and fraction come from a chain of comparisons on it, and a nested chain on the three intervals assigns the five blended matrices; the state integrates with forward Euler at the block's period, because the matrices move with v and there is no fixed system to discretize exactly. All ten are rendered from the one description of the arithmetic the block's own simulation runs.

The three HDL targets are simulation-only: the fraction divides by a signal difference, so they compute in real arithmetic and quantize only at the ports. VHDL keeps the arithmetic in a function of its own.

Simulink bridge

None (Support::None). The counterpart is aerolibschedule/3D Observer Form [A(v),B(v),C(v),F(v),H(v)] in the Aerospace Blockset, and this block reproduces it exactly – but its five matrix parameters are five-dimensional arrays, one slice per breakpoint triple, and neither MATLAB's matrix literal syntax nor an ICore matrix config has that form. So the schedule cannot cross in either direction; the block is reported rather than exported without its matrices. It therefore has no parity testbench; code export verification covers it.

Notes

  • Stateful: n states. Direct feedthrough only when the F matrices differ across the grid (udem = F(v)·x then moves with v at the same instant); e and umeas reach only the state, never the output.
  • Each breakpoint search is inclusive at the bottom of each interval: a variable exactly on an interior breakpoint starts the next interval, with fraction 0.
  • Linear at any instant but scheduled, so it carries no state space and model reduction reports it as unmergeable.

Code facts#

FactValue
registered typeControl_Systems/Gain_Scheduling/Observer_Form_3D
familyControl_Systems/Gain_Scheduling
solver environment classICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Gain_Scheduling_2_Observer_Form_3D
sourcesrc/ICoreBlocks/ICoreBlockLibrary/Blocks/Control_Systems/Gain_Scheduling/Observer_Form_3D/ICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Gain_Scheduling_2_Observer_Form_3D.cpp
headersrc/ICoreBlocks/ICoreBlockLibrary/Blocks/Control_Systems/Gain_Scheduling/Observer_Form_3D/ICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Gain_Scheduling_2_Observer_Form_3D.h
default size on canvas160 × 120 px
ports at insert5 in, 1 out
code generators implementedPython, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog, PLC Structured Text

Ports#

#DirectionSignal typeDescription label
1inICoreDoublee
2inICoreDoublev1
3inICoreDoublev2
4inICoreDoublev3
5inICoreDoubleu_meas
6outICoreDoubleu_dem

Ports the constructor creates. A block whose port list changes with its configuration adds or removes ports at load time; the count above is the one a freshly inserted block has.

Configuration variables#

Config variableDefaultSimulink parameter
A Matrices[-1; -2; -1.5; -2.5; -1.2; -2.2; -1.7; -2.7]—
B Matrices[1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1]—
C Matrices[1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1; 1]—
F Matrices[1; 0.5; 0.8; 0.4; 0.9; 0.45; 0.7; 0.35]—
H Matrices[-2; -3; -2.5; -3.5; -2.2; -3.2; -2.7; -3.7]—
Breakpoints v1[0 1]—
Breakpoints v2[0 1]—
Breakpoints v3[0 1]—
Initial State0—

Every block also carries Sampling Time (s) from ICoreBlockSolverEnvironment: zero or less inherits the solver's rate, a positive value runs the block at that period.

supportSupport::None
Simulink path—
port-count rulePortsParam::None
SampleTime parameteryes

Caveat (shown to the user): aerolibschedule/3D Observer Form [A(v),B(v),C(v),F(v),H(v)] computes exactly what this block does -- measured to 0 under ode1 -- but its five matrix parameters are FIVE-DIMENSIONAL arrays, one slice per breakpoint triple, and neither MATLAB's matrix literal syntax nor an ICore matrix config has that form. So the schedule cannot cross in either direction, and an exported model would carry the ports and no controller. Reported rather than exported to a counterpart that would be missing its matrices

Catalog contract: src/ICoreBlocks/ICoreCoder/ICoreCommandSystem/SimulinkBridge/ICoreSimulinkBlockCatalog.h

Description vs code#

The lists agree. check_block_descriptions.py finds no disagreement between the description's Ports, Parameters, Code export and Simulink bridge lists and the code's.

The verdict above is tools/docs/check_block_descriptions.py (P7.1), which compares LISTS. It cannot read a sentence: "stateless" on a block with a state, an initial-value semantic the recursion does not implement, a "not synthesizable" caveat the HDL banner contradicts. That is the agent audit (P7.3) on BLOCK_DESCRIPTION_AUDIT.md, and this tool's green is not a substitute for one.

File banner (developer view)#

The top comment of the block's .cpp — the maths, the realization and the export strategy, addressed to whoever changes it. It must not contradict the description above (P7.5).

3D Observer Form [A(v),B(v),C(v),F(v),H(v)] -- an observer-based controller on THREE variables z = e + C(v)*x (e = y - y_dem, the tracking error) dx/dt = A(v)*x + (H(v)*z + B(v)*u_meas) u_dem = F(v)*x M(v1,v2,v3) = the trilinear blend of the eight matrices around it, v1 innermost

An observer of the plant (A, B, C) driven by the measured actuator command u_meas and the output error through the gain H, with state feedback F on the estimate. Because the observer is fed what the actuator REALLY did, a saturated or switched-out actuator never winds the estimate up -- the property the Aerospace Blockset names this form for.

MEASURED AGAINST R2026a. The masked subsystem is one Prelookup per variable (all "Index and fraction", extrapolation CLIP, "use last breakpoint" off) feeding five copies of the Interpolate Matrix(x,y,z) arithmetic, a Sum e + C*x, a Sum B*u_meas + H*z, a Sum of that with A*x into one Integrator, and F*x out through a Cast.

⚠ THE MIDDLE SUM IS WRITTEN THE OTHER WAY ROUND HERE than in the 1D Observer Form (which adds H*z + B*u_meas). It is a TWO-term sum, so the two orders are bit-identical and the shared program's grouping -- A*x + (H*z + B*u_meas) -- is the block's arithmetic exactly. With n = 3 states, e of width 2, a 2 x 3 x 3 grid and all three variables sweeping past both ends of their breakpoints, the real block under ode1 and a forward-Euler reference of exactly the program the base runs agree to EXACTLY 0 over 800 samples.

H IS A PARAMETER here, not placed: unlike the Self-Conditioned forms, the mask computes nothing, so any H the user gives is used as given and no toolbox is involved.

NO SIMULINK BRIDGE, for the 1D Controller's reason: the five matrix parameters are FIVE-dimensional arrays (M(:,:,i,j,l) per breakpoint triple). The configs stack the matrices vertically, the first variable fastest, and the description gives the MATLAB line that produces them.

Sample results#

Observer Form 3D — Step: 0 -> 1 at t = 1 sObserver Form 3D — Step: 0 -> 1 at t = 1 s00.51012345t (s)in ICoreDouble-Out-0in ICoreDouble-Out-0in ICoreDouble-Out-0out ICoreDouble-Out-0

The same rig also ran:

StimulusWhat it isOutput range
impulseImpulse: one sample of 1 at k = 5, 0 elsewhere (Repeating Sequence Stair)-0.1991 … 0
rampRamp: slope 1 from t = 0-0.8481 … 0
sineSine Wave: amplitude 1, 2 rad/s, no phase, no bias-0.1909 … 0.2769
tableRepeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sample-0.8847 … 0.2144

Plotted: step — Step: 0 -> 1 at t = 1 s

Category dynamic · sample time 0.1 · 60 steps · commit 4287636be · produced by docsSample --out <folder> --blocks Controller_Blend_2D Observer_Form_2D Observer_Form_3D Self_Conditioned_2D Self_Conditioned_3D --steps 60 · data docs/generated/samples/Control_Systems__Gain_Scheduling__Observer_Form_3D.json · the SVG is generated from those numbers by tools/docs/plot_svg.py, so it is a run and not a drawing (R-D10).