Generated reference › Sum Of Elements — Control Systems/Base Blocks
kind: generated#block#control-systems-base-blocks

Sum Of Elements — Control Systems/Base Blocks

Σ

Control_Systems/Base_Blocks/Sum_Of_Elements · 1 input / 1 output port(s) at insert · exports to Python, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog, PLC Structured Text

Description#

The block's own DESCRIPTION_HTML, rendered verbatim — the same text the config dialog's info panel and the library navigator show. Fix a wrong sentence in the block's .cpp (R-D9), never here.

Sum of Elements

Control Systems / Base Blocks

Adds every entry of its input together and outputs the total: y = Σ u(i,j). For a vector that is the sum of its components; for a matrix it is the sum over all entries. The result is always a single number.

Ports

  • Input – the signal u, of any size [m,n].
  • Output – the total y, always a scalar [1,1], whatever the input size. This block reduces rather than reshapes.

Parameters

  • Sampling Time (s) – zero or less inherits the solver's rate; a positive value runs the block at that period.

Code export

All ten targets: Python, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog and PLC Structured Text. There is nothing to tune, so nothing is exposed as a parameter on the generated core.

Every target accumulates the entries in the same order – row by row, left to right. Floating-point addition is not associative, so a built-in reduction that regrouped the sum would land a rounding step away from the reference: numpy sums pairwise and MATLAB runs down the columns first, so neither built-in is used.

The three HDL targets carry the accumulation in Q16.16 fixed point and are fully synthesizable – a sum needs no divider and no function call. Verilog and SystemVerilog accumulate in a double-width register (2*ICORE_WIDTH), so a long input cannot wrap on the way. VHDL accumulates in the shared Fx variable, which is Q16.16 (sfixed(15 downto -16)) with no headroom beyond its 16 integer bits – so a long input whose running total leaves that range does wrap there. Keep the sum inside the format, or export to Verilog, when the input is both long and large.

Simulink bridge

Import and export, mapped to simulink/Math Operations/Sum of Elements. The block has no parameters of its own; Simulink's counterpart is its Sum block in collapsing form, so Inputs is always written as 1 and CollapseMode as All dimensions – which is what this block computes. Collapsing along one specified dimension has no counterpart here. "Sampling Time (s)" goes to SampleTime, as on every block.

Notes

  • Algebraic, with no state.
  • Linear, and the only reduction in this family that is: the coefficients are all 1, a constant, so the block carries the feed-through state space y = D·u with D a row of ones, and model reduction can absorb it. That only holds when the input is a column. A row input's element sum is u·ones(n,1) – a multiplication from the RIGHT, which no D·u expresses – and a general matrix collapses both dimensions at once, so in those two cases the block reports itself unmergeable rather than offering a set that does not describe it.
  • Dot Product and Product of Elements are the nonlinear reductions beside this one.

Code facts#

FactValue
registered typeControl_Systems/Base_Blocks/Sum_Of_Elements
familyControl_Systems/Base_Blocks
solver environment classICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Base_Blocks_2_Sum_Of_Elements
sourcesrc/ICoreSDK/ICoreBlockLibrary/Blocks/Control_Systems/Base_Blocks/Sum_Of_Elements/ICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Base_Blocks_2_Sum_Of_Elements.cpp
headersrc/ICoreSDK/ICoreBlockLibrary/Blocks/Control_Systems/Base_Blocks/Sum_Of_Elements/ICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Base_Blocks_2_Sum_Of_Elements.h
default size on canvas70 × 70 px
ports at insert1 in, 1 out
code generators implementedPython, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog, PLC Structured Text

Ports#

#DirectionSignal typeDescription label
1inICoreDouble
2outICoreDouble

Ports the constructor creates. A block whose port list changes with its configuration adds or removes ports at load time; the count above is the one a freshly inserted block has.

Configuration variables#

No config variable beyond the Sampling Time (s) every block carries.

Every block also carries Sampling Time (s) from ICoreBlockSolverEnvironment: zero or less inherits the solver's rate, a positive value runs the block at that period.

supportSupport::Both
Simulink pathsimulink/Math Operations/Sum of Elements
port-count rulePortsParam::None
SampleTime parameteryes
always setInputs = 1, CollapseMode = All dimensions

Catalog contract: src/ICoreSDK/ICoreCoder/ICoreCommandSystem/SimulinkBridge/ICoreSimulinkBlockCatalog.h

Description vs code#

The lists agree. check_block_descriptions.py finds no disagreement between the description's Ports, Parameters, Code export and Simulink bridge lists and the code's.

The verdict above is tools/docs/check_block_descriptions.py (P7.1), which compares LISTS. It cannot read a sentence: "stateless" on a block with a state, an initial-value semantic the recursion does not implement, a "not synthesizable" caveat the HDL banner contradicts. That is the agent audit (P7.3) on BLOCK_DESCRIPTION_AUDIT.md, and this tool's green is not a substitute for one.

File banner (developer view)#

The top comment of the block's .cpp — the maths, the realization and the export strategy, addressed to whoever changes it. It must not contradict the description above (P7.5).

Sum of Elements block -- collapse a signal to the sum of its entries y = sum over every element of u. One input in, one SCALAR out, whatever the input shape. Algebraic and stateless -- but LINEAR, so unlike the other reductions in this family it carries a feed-through state space (see the header, and assignFeedThroughStateSpace).

The output is 1x1 regardless of the input, so the size is forced in initializePortSignalSize() rather than left to the base class's "outputs take the input's size" default.

Every target accumulates in the SAME order -- row-major over the elements -- because floating-point addition is not associative and a different order is a different sum. That is why the software targets spell the loop out instead of calling a language's own sum, whose reduction order is not guaranteed (numpy pairwise-reduces; MATLAB runs down columns).

Sample results#

Sum Of Elements — Repeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sampleSum Of Elements — Repeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sample-202-2-10123inputoutput
tin ICoreDouble-Out-0out ICoreDouble-Out-0
0-2-2
0.40.50.5
0.8-2-2
1.20.50.5
1.6-2-2
20.50.5
2.4-2-2
2.80.50.5
3.2-2-2
3.60.50.5
4-2-2
4.40.50.5
4.8-2-2
5.20.50.5

Every 4th of 60 samples, from the table stimulus.

The same rig also ran:

StimulusWhat it isOutput range
impulseImpulse: one sample of 1 at k = 5, 0 elsewhere (Repeating Sequence Stair)0 … 1
rampRamp: slope 1 from t = 00 … 5.8
sineSine Wave: amplitude 1, 2 rad/s, no phase, no bias-1 … 0.9996
stepStep: 0 -> 1 at t = 1 s0 … 1

Plotted: table — Repeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sample

Category static · sample time 0.1 · 60 steps · commit ccf005c8 · produced by docsSample --out <folder> --steps 60 · data docs/generated/samples/Control_Systems__Base_Blocks__Sum_Of_Elements.json · the SVG is generated from those numbers by tools/docs/plot_svg.py, so it is a run and not a drawing (R-D10).