Generated reference › Mux — Control Systems/Base Blocks
kind: generated#block#control-systems-base-blocks

Mux — Control Systems/Base Blocks

Control_Systems/Base_Blocks/Mux · 2 input / 1 output port(s) at insert · exports to Python, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog, PLC Structured Text

Description#

The block's own DESCRIPTION_HTML, rendered verbatim — the same text the config dialog's info panel and the library navigator show. Fix a wrong sentence in the block's .cpp (R-D9), never here.

Mux

Control Systems / Base Blocks

Combines several input signals into one wider signal by stacking them vertically, in port order. A [2,1] and a [3,1] input become a single [5,1] output.

Ports

  • Inputs – two by default, and the count is user-editable. At least two are required. They may differ in row count but must all agree in column count.
  • Output – the stack: as many rows as all inputs together, and the inputs' shared column count.

Parameters

  • Sampling Time (s) – zero or less inherits the solver's rate; a positive value runs the block at that period.

Code export

All ten targets: Python, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog and PLC Structured Text. The stack is unrolled at export time, so the generated code is plain assignment with no loop over ports.

Simulink bridge

Import and export, mapped to simulink/Signal Routing/Mux. There is no parameter behind the width on either side: the port count becomes Simulink's Inputs number, and an imported count becomes this port list. "Sampling Time (s)" goes to SampleTime, as on every block.

Notes

  • Algebraic, with no state – pure signal routing, nothing is scaled or reordered.
  • The output size is derived from the inputs, so it is only settled once the upstream blocks have resolved theirs.

Code facts#

FactValue
registered typeControl_Systems/Base_Blocks/Mux
familyControl_Systems/Base_Blocks
solver environment classICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Base_Blocks_2_Mux
sourcesrc/ICoreSDK/ICoreBlockLibrary/Blocks/Control_Systems/Base_Blocks/Mux/ICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Base_Blocks_2_Mux.cpp
headersrc/ICoreSDK/ICoreBlockLibrary/Blocks/Control_Systems/Base_Blocks/Mux/ICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Base_Blocks_2_Mux.h
default size on canvas20 × 60 px
ports at insert2 in, 1 out
code generators implementedPython, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog, PLC Structured Text

Ports#

#DirectionSignal typeDescription label
1inICoreDouble
2inICoreDouble
3outICoreDouble

Ports the constructor creates. A block whose port list changes with its configuration adds or removes ports at load time; the count above is the one a freshly inserted block has.

Configuration variables#

No config variable beyond the Sampling Time (s) every block carries.

Every block also carries Sampling Time (s) from ICoreBlockSolverEnvironment: zero or less inherits the solver's rate, a positive value runs the block at that period.

supportSupport::Both
Simulink pathsimulink/Signal Routing/Mux
port-count rulePortsParam::MuxCount
SampleTime parameterno — the counterpart defines none; the rate stays on the ICore side

Catalog contract: src/ICoreSDK/ICoreCoder/ICoreCommandSystem/SimulinkBridge/ICoreSimulinkBlockCatalog.h

Description vs code#

The checker has a blind spot here — it could not resolve something (a grouped port bullet, a computed config name), which is reported and never counted as a pass. A reader has to settle it:

  • B0 Ports lists 2 entries for 3 ports (2 in, 1 out) — grouped, or one undocumented? a reader must say

The verdict above is tools/docs/check_block_descriptions.py (P7.1), which compares LISTS. It cannot read a sentence: "stateless" on a block with a state, an initial-value semantic the recursion does not implement, a "not synthesizable" caveat the HDL banner contradicts. That is the agent audit (P7.3) on BLOCK_DESCRIPTION_AUDIT.md, and this tool's green is not a substitute for one.

Sample results#

Mux — Repeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sampleMux — Repeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sample-202012345t (s)in ICoreDouble-Out-0in ICoreDouble-Out-0out ICoreDouble-Out-0 [2x1] entry 0
tin ICoreDouble-Out-0in ICoreDouble-Out-0out ICoreDouble-Out-0 [2x1] entry 0
0-2-2[-2, -2]
0.40.50.5[0.5, 0.5]
0.8-2-2[-2, -2]
1.20.50.5[0.5, 0.5]
1.6-2-2[-2, -2]
20.50.5[0.5, 0.5]
2.4-2-2[-2, -2]
2.80.50.5[0.5, 0.5]
3.2-2-2[-2, -2]
3.60.50.5[0.5, 0.5]
4-2-2[-2, -2]
4.40.50.5[0.5, 0.5]
4.8-2-2[-2, -2]
5.20.50.5[0.5, 0.5]

Every 4th of 60 samples, from the table stimulus.

The same rig also ran:

StimulusWhat it isOutput range
impulseImpulse: one sample of 1 at k = 5, 0 elsewhere (Repeating Sequence Stair)0 … 1
rampRamp: slope 1 from t = 00 … 5.8
sineSine Wave: amplitude 1, 2 rad/s, no phase, no bias-1 … 0.9996
stepStep: 0 -> 1 at t = 1 s0 … 1

Plotted: table — Repeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sample

Category static · sample time 0.1 · 60 steps · commit ccf005c8 · produced by docsSample --out <folder> --steps 60 · data docs/generated/samples/Control_Systems__Base_Blocks__Mux.json · the SVG is generated from those numbers by tools/docs/plot_svg.py, so it is a run and not a drawing (R-D10).