Generated reference › IsSymmetric — Control Systems/Matrix Operations
kind: generated#block#control-systems-matrix-operations

IsSymmetric — Control Systems/Matrix Operations

Control_Systems/Matrix_Operations/IsSymmetric · 1 input / 1 output port(s) at insert · exports to Python, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog, PLC Structured Text

Description#

The block's own DESCRIPTION_HTML, rendered verbatim — the same text the config dialog's info panel and the library navigator show. Fix a wrong sentence in the block's .cpp (R-D9), never here.

IsSymmetric

Control Systems / Matrix Operations

A test, not a transform: the output is 1 when the input matrix passes and 0 when it does not.

  • Symmetricu(i,j) = u(j,i) for every entry, i.e. u = uT.
  • Skew-Symmetricu(i,j) = −u(j,i) for every entry, i.e. u = −uT. This forces every diagonal entry to be exactly zero, since only 0 is its own negative.

A non-square input is not an error: it cannot be symmetric under either test, so the answer is 0. Simulink's block answers the same way.

Ports

  • u – the matrix to test, of any size [m,n]. Only a square one can pass.
  • Output – a 1×1 signal carrying 1 or 0. ICore has no boolean signal type – every signal is a double – so the verdict arrives as those two values rather than as a logical. Simulink's block emits a genuine boolean, which is the one difference across the bridge and costs nothing, since 1 and 0 are what a boolean compares equal to.

Parameters

  • Symmetry Type – which test to apply. This selects the code path rather than retuning one, so each option is a separate branch in all ten export targets.
    • Symmetric – u = uT. The default, as in Simulink.
    • Skew-Symmetric – u = −uT, diagonal included, so a matrix with any nonzero on its diagonal fails.
  • Sampling Time (s) – zero or less inherits the solver's rate; a positive value runs the block at that period.

Code export

All ten targets: Python, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog and PLC Structured Text. Nothing is exposed as a tunable parameter: which entries are compared is structural and is fixed into the generated code at export time, as one explicit comparison per entry pair rather than a call to each language's own symmetry helper. Where the input's SHAPE already decides the answer – a non-square input, or a 1×1 – every target emits the constant instead of a comparison. The three HDL targets are fully synthesizable: exact comparisons and two constants, with no arithmetic.

The HDL cores test QUANTIZED values, which is worth knowing before reading a red row. An HDL port carries Q16.16, so two entries that differ by less than one quantum (1.5×10−5) arrive equal and the hardware answers 1 where the reference answers 0. A matrix built by scaling one signal – where the entries differ by a fixed factor rather than a small one – is unaffected.

Simulink bridge

Import and export, mapped to simulink/Matrix Operations/IsSymmetric. "Symmetry Type" goes to Mode, one option for one option (Symmetric, Skew-Symmetric), so that round trip is lossless.

The rate does NOT cross: Simulink's IsSymmetric defines only Mode, with no SampleTime, so the entry sets hasSampleTimeParam = false and "Sampling Time (s)" stays on the ICore side. Writing that parameter anyway would be a hard set_param error in MATLAB rather than a warning, aborting the whole generated script.

Notes

  • Algebraic, with no state: the output depends only on the current input.
  • The comparison is EXACT, as Simulink's is – neither side has a tolerance parameter. A matrix assembled by floating-point arithmetic is usually only symmetric to within a rounding error, so expect this block to answer 0 for one that is symmetric on paper: A + A' is exactly symmetric, but a product such as C'·C generally is not.
  • On ICore's real signals this block and IsHermitian compute the same thing, the conjugate of a real number being itself. Both exist so that a Simulink model containing either imports and exports back to the same block rather than being quietly rewritten into the other.
  • No state space: the block is a comparison, not a linear map, so no D·u represents it and model reduction reports it as unmergeable.

Code facts#

FactValue
registered typeControl_Systems/Matrix_Operations/IsSymmetric
familyControl_Systems/Matrix_Operations
solver environment classICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Matrix_Operations_2_IsSymmetric
sourcesrc/ICoreSDK/ICoreBlockLibrary/Blocks/Control_Systems/Matrix_Operations/IsSymmetric/ICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Matrix_Operations_2_IsSymmetric.cpp
headersrc/ICoreSDK/ICoreBlockLibrary/Blocks/Control_Systems/Matrix_Operations/IsSymmetric/ICoreBlock_0_Control_Systems_1_Matrix_Operations_2_IsSymmetric.h
default size on canvas75 × 70 px
ports at insert1 in, 1 out
code generators implementedPython, MATLAB, Java, Rust, C, C++, VHDL, Verilog, SystemVerilog, PLC Structured Text

Ports#

#DirectionSignal typeDescription label
1inICoreDouble
2outICoreDouble

Ports the constructor creates. A block whose port list changes with its configuration adds or removes ports at load time; the count above is the one a freshly inserted block has.

Configuration variables#

Config variableDefaultSimulink parameter
Symmetry TypeSymmetric%~%Skew-Symmetric~~SymmetricMode

Every block also carries Sampling Time (s) from ICoreBlockSolverEnvironment: zero or less inherits the solver's rate, a positive value runs the block at that period.

supportSupport::Both
Simulink pathsimulink/Matrix Operations/IsSymmetric
port-count rulePortsParam::None
SampleTime parameterno — the counterpart defines none; the rate stays on the ICore side
ICore configSimulink parameterValue translation
Symmetry TypeModeSymmetricSymmetric, Skew-SymmetricSkew-Symmetric

Caveat (shown to the user): the rate does not cross: Simulink's IsSymmetric defines only Mode, with no SampleTime, so "Sampling Time (s)" stays on the ICore side. Simulink's output is a genuine boolean where ICore's is a 1/0 double, every ICore signal being a double.

Catalog contract: src/ICoreSDK/ICoreCoder/ICoreCommandSystem/SimulinkBridge/ICoreSimulinkBlockCatalog.h

Description vs code#

The lists agree. check_block_descriptions.py finds no disagreement between the description's Ports, Parameters, Code export and Simulink bridge lists and the code's.

The verdict above is tools/docs/check_block_descriptions.py (P7.1), which compares LISTS. It cannot read a sentence: "stateless" on a block with a state, an initial-value semantic the recursion does not implement, a "not synthesizable" caveat the HDL banner contradicts. That is the agent audit (P7.3) on BLOCK_DESCRIPTION_AUDIT.md, and this tool's green is not a substitute for one.

File banner (developer view)#

The top comment of the block's .cpp — the maths, the realization and the export strategy, addressed to whoever changes it. It must not contradict the description above (P7.5).

IsSymmetric block -- 1 when the input matrix is symmetric, 0 when it is not Two tests, chosen by "Symmetry Type": Symmetric u(i,j) = u(j,i) for every i, j Skew-Symmetric u(i,j) = -u(j,i) for every i, j, which forces a zero diagonal

A NON-SQUARE INPUT IS NOT AN ERROR. It cannot be symmetric under either test, so the answer is simply 0 -- confirmed against the real Simulink block, which returns false for a 3x2 rather than refusing to compile. The shape is known at export time, so the generated cores for such a rig emit the constant 0 rather than a comparison that could never be true.

THE COMPARISON IS EXACT, as Simulink's is: neither block has a tolerance parameter. That is the block's one sharp edge for a user, because a matrix ASSEMBLED by floating-point arithmetic is usually only symmetric to within a rounding error -- A + A' is exactly symmetric, but C'*C generally is not. The description says so where it will be read.

WHY THE PREDICATE IS A LIST OF PAIRS. Every test in this family (this block, IsHermitian and IsTriangular) reduces to "these entries must equal these entries, possibly negated". Emitting from that list rather than from a hand-written condition per language is what keeps the ten backends agreeing about which pairs are compared and in which direction.

Sample results#

IsSymmetric — Repeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sampleIsSymmetric — Repeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sample0.90.9511.051.1-2-10123inputoutput
tin ICoreDouble-Out-0out ICoreDouble-Out-0
0-21
0.40.51
0.8-21
1.20.51
1.6-21
20.51
2.4-21
2.80.51
3.2-21
3.60.51
4-21
4.40.51
4.8-21
5.20.51

Every 4th of 60 samples, from the table stimulus.

The same rig also ran:

StimulusWhat it isOutput range
impulseImpulse: one sample of 1 at k = 5, 0 elsewhere (Repeating Sequence Stair)1 … 1
rampRamp: slope 1 from t = 01 … 1
sineSine Wave: amplitude 1, 2 rad/s, no phase, no bias1 … 1
stepStep: 0 -> 1 at t = 1 s1 … 1

Plotted: table — Repeating Sequence Stair: [-2 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 2 3], one entry per sample

Category static · sample time 0.1 · 60 steps · commit ccf005c8 · produced by docsSample --out <folder> --steps 60 · data docs/generated/samples/Control_Systems__Matrix_Operations__IsSymmetric.json · the SVG is generated from those numbers by tools/docs/plot_svg.py, so it is a run and not a drawing (R-D10).